ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
On copyright.
OK. A bit of a backstory: I'm a Linux user out of neccesity and moral reasons (I try to avoid piracy). I don't hate big businesses. I don't think proprietary software (or art) is evil. I'm a copyright skeptic, though. I'm against plagiarism but I'm also against denying the rights of the customer. If I bought or otherwise legally obtained it it should be my right to do with it as I please as long I don't plagiarize and openly&properly credit (copy it, share it, resell it, use it as many times I want, show it to people, create derivative works of/for it etc.). If I'm not allowed to than I don't own it. If I don't own it... well I didn't actually bought it. Then why is it piracy theft again? Breach of EULA at best. Not stealing. And yes, despite this I think it's morally wrong to pirate anything legally available. Go figure.
On Apple...
I don't have much to say about them, their products look nice and seem to be highly usable, but when I hear about their "innovations" I tend to joke about "iRoll", as I think they somehow convinced the world that innovation equals reinventing the wheel. And as far as I can tell their trend is to do the iTreatment to older and older technologies, which is not bad by any means, just... well... You keep using that word...
OK. A bit of a backstory: I'm a Linux user out of neccesity and moral reasons (I try to avoid piracy). I don't hate big businesses. I don't think proprietary software (or art) is evil. I'm a copyright skeptic, though. I'm against plagiarism but I'm also against denying the rights of the customer. If I bought or otherwise legally obtained it it should be my right to do with it as I please as long I don't plagiarize and openly&properly credit (copy it, share it, resell it, use it as many times I want, show it to people, create derivative works of/for it etc.). If I'm not allowed to than I don't own it. If I don't own it... well I didn't actually bought it. Then why is it piracy theft again? Breach of EULA at best. Not stealing. And yes, despite this I think it's morally wrong to pirate anything legally available. Go figure.
On Apple...
I don't have much to say about them, their products look nice and seem to be highly usable, but when I hear about their "innovations" I tend to joke about "iRoll", as I think they somehow convinced the world that innovation equals reinventing the wheel. And as far as I can tell their trend is to do the iTreatment to older and older technologies, which is not bad by any means, just... well... You keep using that word...
Gallery Pass
You'll find a little bit of everything in here, from beautiful fantasy characters, spooky creatures, anime, cool sci-fi, fabulous wallpaper, abstract images and Disney-style work. New stuff added (at least) once a week. Everything in this gallery is unique to this gallery and won't be available in my public offerings! All artwork is AI generated via Midjourney.
$3/month
Superhero...
My previous post on Marvel Legacy got me thinking that most of their problems stem from 2 big sources:
1) Business practices 2 decades out of date. (I won't touch this. But I could kill for a numbering system that is designed to be followable not collector's bait. :P)
2) They seem to think they've a singular product: Superhero comics (and related merchandising).
What's the problem with the second? I mean it's trivially true. So much so that Marvel and DC own the trademark on the word*.
Well… let's start with that in colloquial usage “superhero” is an incredibly vaguely defined term. My general go to description is “
Legacy of Marvel Legacy
Let's write about comic book marketing. I'm sure there is nothing controversial about that… :meow:
First things first. I do preface my rants about art with “Hi, I'm illiterate in this. So my opinion might be way off.”, now in the case of marketing I'm at the very least semi-literate as far as I did take some college level courses about the subject, but I'm by no means an expert. Lot of what I'll write here is very common sense at the end of the day.
What is Marvel Legacy (from now on LM) exactly?
It's the 2017 iteration of Marvel's annual “we're still relevant, buy our stuff” initiatives. It's a marketing ploy
Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 2
Round 1: Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 1
So... let's continue this shit. We got 4 new Stupidly-Named-Initiative #1s to check. I can already tell you that I didn't hate any of them nearly as much as X-Men Gold so we're off to a better start, and as I don't have to explain my background again (see Round 1 for that) this will probably be shorter too.
On the InHumans' side the new Black Bolt started and it's... trippy as hel. So it might not be as new reader friendly. Also there is a LOT of dramatically repetitive narration if that bothers anyone (the ending of the issue implies a narrative reason for it though).
On the X-Men side we g
Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 1
Apparently comic books make me wanna rant most nowadays. Sorry. ^^;
So Marvel's stupidly named initiative to reframe the InHumans (again), and stop the unbearable screeching noise X-fan's make (I don't like X-fans), started last week and...
My short opinion: People should be really careful what they wish for. Especially when nostalgia is involved.
Not that I can have a highly sophisticated opinion about the thingy after just 4 issues (InHumans Prime, X-Men Prime, Royals #1, X-Men Gold #1) but I... I think I've to start at the beginning, with my whole damn Marvel comicbook reading history.
My connection to the InHumans is non-existent...
© 2013 - 2024 Mali-chan
Comments1
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In