ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
I like urban fantasy I adore the Dresden Files (it does have problems like being extremely male gazey)... so I got this series handed to me*, and, well, read the title of this thing. They assured me that I will like it... and I kinda sorta can see why as on the surface the two series are incredibly alike, but...
The trick with any book, but especially one narrated in the first person, is to create a protagonist, who keeps readers interested. So what is the difference between the two "witty" (matter of taste, one is nerdy jokes the other more groan worthy puns oriented) magical badasses that makes me like one and want to strangle the other? Well, Atticus is all Dresden's bad qualities without any of his redeeming ones.
Is Dresden a chauvinistic jerkass with a penchant of judging people by their looks? Yes. Asshole excuses one-o-one "Boys will be boys."
Is he an anti-human jerkass, who lets the supernatural forces murder around without doing anything? No. Well, Atticus is. Asshole excuses one-o-one "Might makes right".
It's OK. There is a place for books with anti-heroic or even villainous protagonists, but Atticus isn't one of these either because the books try really hard to sell him as an "average dudebro casanova" (Asshole excuses one-o-one "Boys will be boys" x2), 2000 years old obi-wan (Asshole excuses one-o-one "I'm I know better than a youngster, woman, etc."), and oh so heartbroken woobie with tragic past (Asshole excuses one-o-one "I can't help it I was hurt too"), all at once. Accompanied by lots of dog petting (occasionally literally**) to show how much he cares for his loved ones (Asshole excuses one-o-one "But my bestest friends are X!") while simultaneously his actions showing that he cares shit about his acquaintances casually murdering all the unnamed red shirts***, he occasionally even excuses them, or his own decisions causing countless deaths (or worse) (Asshole excuses one-o-one "See what you made me do!").
I think "Having their cake and eat it too" is the right expression.
All this combined with, well, Atticus being insanely powerful from the very first page so not losing much overall, create a really REALLY nasty case of Gary Stu.
The other problems with the series include:
- The supporting characters being extremely flat or Stu... or pretty much this comic: harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=… The only exception being the dog and the Irish Old Lady (she is at least a lovable national stereotype).
- The plot which is mostly dead predictable after it thew at you that books big background info.
The good things... well... I liked the world... while the gods running on belief and magic on belief and deals thought is hardly groundbreaking, but was a lot different to what I expected. (I frankly expected a Dresden Files knock off, which is kind of is, but at least not in this regard.)
I know this series is popular, and it's hard to find bad reviews of it... which scares me. Really really scares me. :scared:
* I managed to read the first 2,5 books. I don't know and don't want to know if it gets better later.
** He has one. Actually the dog is one of the more bearable characters.
*** He show remorse once or twice in the first book... so he compensated their families from the money he got by suing the police for things he too manipulated by magic. It's so nice when you can just push the responsibility to other unrelated parties isn't it?
The trick with any book, but especially one narrated in the first person, is to create a protagonist, who keeps readers interested. So what is the difference between the two "witty" (matter of taste, one is nerdy jokes the other more groan worthy puns oriented) magical badasses that makes me like one and want to strangle the other? Well, Atticus is all Dresden's bad qualities without any of his redeeming ones.
Is Dresden a chauvinistic jerkass with a penchant of judging people by their looks? Yes. Asshole excuses one-o-one "Boys will be boys."
Is he an anti-human jerkass, who lets the supernatural forces murder around without doing anything? No. Well, Atticus is. Asshole excuses one-o-one "Might makes right".
It's OK. There is a place for books with anti-heroic or even villainous protagonists, but Atticus isn't one of these either because the books try really hard to sell him as an "average dudebro casanova" (Asshole excuses one-o-one "Boys will be boys" x2), 2000 years old obi-wan (Asshole excuses one-o-one "I'm I know better than a youngster, woman, etc."), and oh so heartbroken woobie with tragic past (Asshole excuses one-o-one "I can't help it I was hurt too"), all at once. Accompanied by lots of dog petting (occasionally literally**) to show how much he cares for his loved ones (Asshole excuses one-o-one "But my bestest friends are X!") while simultaneously his actions showing that he cares shit about his acquaintances casually murdering all the unnamed red shirts***, he occasionally even excuses them, or his own decisions causing countless deaths (or worse) (Asshole excuses one-o-one "See what you made me do!").
I think "Having their cake and eat it too" is the right expression.
All this combined with, well, Atticus being insanely powerful from the very first page so not losing much overall, create a really REALLY nasty case of Gary Stu.
The other problems with the series include:
- The supporting characters being extremely flat or Stu... or pretty much this comic: harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=… The only exception being the dog and the Irish Old Lady (she is at least a lovable national stereotype).
- The plot which is mostly dead predictable after it thew at you that books big background info.
The good things... well... I liked the world... while the gods running on belief and magic on belief and deals thought is hardly groundbreaking, but was a lot different to what I expected. (I frankly expected a Dresden Files knock off, which is kind of is, but at least not in this regard.)
I know this series is popular, and it's hard to find bad reviews of it... which scares me. Really really scares me. :scared:
* I managed to read the first 2,5 books. I don't know and don't want to know if it gets better later.
** He has one. Actually the dog is one of the more bearable characters.
*** He show remorse once or twice in the first book... so he compensated their families from the money he got by suing the police for things he too manipulated by magic. It's so nice when you can just push the responsibility to other unrelated parties isn't it?
Superhero...
My previous post on Marvel Legacy got me thinking that most of their problems stem from 2 big sources:
1) Business practices 2 decades out of date. (I won't touch this. But I could kill for a numbering system that is designed to be followable not collector's bait. :P)
2) They seem to think they've a singular product: Superhero comics (and related merchandising).
What's the problem with the second? I mean it's trivially true. So much so that Marvel and DC own the trademark on the word*.
Well… let's start with that in colloquial usage “superhero” is an incredibly vaguely defined term. My general go to description is “
Legacy of Marvel Legacy
Let's write about comic book marketing. I'm sure there is nothing controversial about that… :meow:
First things first. I do preface my rants about art with “Hi, I'm illiterate in this. So my opinion might be way off.”, now in the case of marketing I'm at the very least semi-literate as far as I did take some college level courses about the subject, but I'm by no means an expert. Lot of what I'll write here is very common sense at the end of the day.
What is Marvel Legacy (from now on LM) exactly?
It's the 2017 iteration of Marvel's annual “we're still relevant, buy our stuff” initiatives. It's a marketing ploy
Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 2
Round 1: Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 1
So... let's continue this shit. We got 4 new Stupidly-Named-Initiative #1s to check. I can already tell you that I didn't hate any of them nearly as much as X-Men Gold so we're off to a better start, and as I don't have to explain my background again (see Round 1 for that) this will probably be shorter too.
On the InHumans' side the new Black Bolt started and it's... trippy as hel. So it might not be as new reader friendly. Also there is a LOT of dramatically repetitive narration if that bothers anyone (the ending of the issue implies a narrative reason for it though).
On the X-Men side we g
Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 1
Apparently comic books make me wanna rant most nowadays. Sorry. ^^;
So Marvel's stupidly named initiative to reframe the InHumans (again), and stop the unbearable screeching noise X-fan's make (I don't like X-fans), started last week and...
My short opinion: People should be really careful what they wish for. Especially when nostalgia is involved.
Not that I can have a highly sophisticated opinion about the thingy after just 4 issues (InHumans Prime, X-Men Prime, Royals #1, X-Men Gold #1) but I... I think I've to start at the beginning, with my whole damn Marvel comicbook reading history.
My connection to the InHumans is non-existent...
© 2013 - 2024 Mali-chan
Comments0
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In