ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
Soooooo... they implemented the new comment system this week. NOW I CAN'T COMMENT ANYMORE. I understand that my more than 5 years old system is well OLD and unsupported and some functions won't work on it, but commenting is a big f-cking deal, as it's the basis of my community life so if it doesn't work that cherished experience they like to go on about dies horribly.
Why isn't there an opt out?
Or at least a workaround?
Also.
Why is it than when Sta.sh Writer gets implemented in a main page function it stops working (on my system)?
- I mean this journal is written in Sta.sh Writer directly it works, but if I try writing journals from the journal menu it won't load (blank page; I get this with the new comment system too, but for journals there ARE workarounds, for commenting not so much).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What would I expect from an artsite? (The ones flagged with NW are currently flat out not working for me on , WA only with workarounds):
- Viewing (I don't even expect video playback), downloading (if the artist is cool with it), faving, and commenting (NW) the works of others; uploading (WA), changing/editing informaton (NW, except journals), and deleting my own; following artists and a search function. And that's about it. Yeah. I'm sooooo unpleasable. :/
Why isn't there an opt out?
Or at least a workaround?
Also.
Why is it than when Sta.sh Writer gets implemented in a main page function it stops working (on my system)?
- I mean this journal is written in Sta.sh Writer directly it works, but if I try writing journals from the journal menu it won't load (blank page; I get this with the new comment system too, but for journals there ARE workarounds, for commenting not so much).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What would I expect from an artsite? (The ones flagged with NW are currently flat out not working for me on , WA only with workarounds):
- Viewing (I don't even expect video playback), downloading (if the artist is cool with it), faving, and commenting (NW) the works of others; uploading (WA), changing/editing informaton (NW, except journals), and deleting my own; following artists and a search function. And that's about it. Yeah. I'm sooooo unpleasable. :/
Superhero...
My previous post on Marvel Legacy got me thinking that most of their problems stem from 2 big sources:
1) Business practices 2 decades out of date. (I won't touch this. But I could kill for a numbering system that is designed to be followable not collector's bait. :P)
2) They seem to think they've a singular product: Superhero comics (and related merchandising).
What's the problem with the second? I mean it's trivially true. So much so that Marvel and DC own the trademark on the word*.
Well… let's start with that in colloquial usage “superhero” is an incredibly vaguely defined term. My general go to description is “
Legacy of Marvel Legacy
Let's write about comic book marketing. I'm sure there is nothing controversial about that… :meow:
First things first. I do preface my rants about art with “Hi, I'm illiterate in this. So my opinion might be way off.”, now in the case of marketing I'm at the very least semi-literate as far as I did take some college level courses about the subject, but I'm by no means an expert. Lot of what I'll write here is very common sense at the end of the day.
What is Marvel Legacy (from now on LM) exactly?
It's the 2017 iteration of Marvel's annual “we're still relevant, buy our stuff” initiatives. It's a marketing ploy
Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 2
Round 1: Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 1
So... let's continue this shit. We got 4 new Stupidly-Named-Initiative #1s to check. I can already tell you that I didn't hate any of them nearly as much as X-Men Gold so we're off to a better start, and as I don't have to explain my background again (see Round 1 for that) this will probably be shorter too.
On the InHumans' side the new Black Bolt started and it's... trippy as hel. So it might not be as new reader friendly. Also there is a LOT of dramatically repetitive narration if that bothers anyone (the ending of the issue implies a narrative reason for it though).
On the X-Men side we g
Some thoughts of ResurreXion... round 1
Apparently comic books make me wanna rant most nowadays. Sorry. ^^;
So Marvel's stupidly named initiative to reframe the InHumans (again), and stop the unbearable screeching noise X-fan's make (I don't like X-fans), started last week and...
My short opinion: People should be really careful what they wish for. Especially when nostalgia is involved.
Not that I can have a highly sophisticated opinion about the thingy after just 4 issues (InHumans Prime, X-Men Prime, Royals #1, X-Men Gold #1) but I... I think I've to start at the beginning, with my whole damn Marvel comicbook reading history.
My connection to the InHumans is non-existent...
© 2013 - 2024 Mali-chan
Comments0
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In